Skip to content

Conversation

@mheob-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.

Releases

@mheob/[email protected]

Patch Changes

  • #315 (@mheob): Update React ESLint rules configuration.

@mheob-bot mheob-bot requested a review from mheob as a code owner October 21, 2025 06:01
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 21, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
eslint-config Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 21, 2025 6:01am

💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

⛔ Ignored keywords (2)
  • WIP
  • chore(release)

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch changeset-release/main

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit e9ce00c into main Oct 21, 2025
10 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the changeset-release/main branch October 21, 2025 06:02
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 21, 2025

PR Review: Changesets Release PR

Summary

This is an automated release PR generated by the Changesets action to publish @mheob/[email protected]. The changes look good overall.

Code Quality ✅

Strengths:

  • Clean automated changeset workflow - the PR correctly removes the consumed changeset file
  • Proper semver bump (patch version for the React ESLint rules update)
  • Changelog entry is well-formatted and includes proper attribution
  • Version bump in package.json is accurate (8.14.3 → 8.14.4)

Best Practices ✅

The PR follows the repository's conventions:

  • Conventional commits pattern used (chore(release):)
  • Changesets workflow properly integrated
  • No manual intervention needed in the automated files

Potential Issues 🔍

None identified - This is a standard automated release PR with the expected structure.

Underlying Changes Review (from PR #315)

Since this releases changes from #315, I reviewed those as well:

Positive changes:

  • Re-enabled important React JSX rules that were incorrectly disabled (jsx-no-duplicate-props, jsx-uses-react, jsx-uses-vars)
  • Consolidated duplicate rules (no-comment-textnodesjsx-no-comment-textnodes)
  • Fixed plugin name in comment (eslint-plugin-react-x)
  • Removed unused Husky post-merge hook

Minor observation:

  • The rule react/no-misused-capture-owner-stack was removed - if this was intentional (e.g., deprecated or causing issues), that's fine. Otherwise, consider documenting why it was removed.

Security Concerns ✅

No security issues identified. This is a configuration package release with no runtime code changes.

Performance Considerations ✅

No performance impact - these are ESLint configuration changes that affect linting time, not runtime performance.

Recommendation

✅ APPROVED - Safe to merge when ready to publish the new version to npm.

The automated release workflow is functioning correctly, and the underlying changes improve the React ESLint configuration by re-enabling important rules and cleaning up the configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants